21 July 2021
Sir Mike Penning calls for MPs to be able to question Government on Cumberlege Review response

Following the Government’s written response to the recommendations made in its own report, the Cumberlege Review, into Primodos, sodium valproate and pelvic mesh, Sir Mike Penning calls on the relevant Minister to appear before the House of Commons to enable scrutiny by MPs on the response and the lack of compensation for victims.

Written Statement: Publication of the Government response to the Report of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review (IMMDS Review)

Sir Mike Penning (Hemel Hempstead) (Con)

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. Thank you for allowing me to make this point of order, of which I gave Mr Speaker notice.

Today, the Government and the Department of Health and Social Care have issued a written ministerial statement on their review of the scandal of Primodos, sodium valproate and pelvic mesh. On average, the recommendations were given three to four paragraphs in the document. This affects every single constituency and it is an insult to this House—and, more importantly, to the victims of the conditions brought on them by the NHS—that we are not here listening to a Minister and questioning them. Is there any indication of why, in this short time—I am sure that is why the statement was issued so late today—we have not got a Minister before us today and why, for such an important issue to so many victims in this country, and one that has been going on for years, the Government’s own review gives only four paragraphs per recommendation and no compensation? I know the Minister is listening and she may like to pass this message on.

Madam Deputy Speaker (Dame Eleanor Laing)

I thank the right hon. Gentleman for having given me notice that he intended to raise a point of order. As he knows very well, I cannot answer for what the Government do. It is not for the Chair to decide which statements are made here and which are made as written statements. To be the fair to the Government, we already have three statements today.

Sir Mike Penning 

It should be four.

Madam Deputy Speaker 

Well, if it had been four, I would have had people complaining that they did not have time to speak on the important Bill that is also before us. I fully appreciate the right hon. Gentleman’s points about the importance of the subject matter of the written statement and I am sure he will seek advice from the Table Office as to how he could take this matter further. I am also certain that Ministers have heard his concerns.

Hansard